Combining methods can help to verify results. It is a good practice to use different types of methods to explore a topic. This allows for ‘triangulation’ between methods. This can be useful to validate your results and understand nuances within your data.

Changing circumstances may cause your data collection plans to change. Given the unusual situation created by the COVID-19 pandemic it might be that methods which are deemed safe at the moment are no longer safe during or at the end of your project. If, for example, at baseline you chose to measure behaviour through household spot-checks, but these were no longer safe to conduct at the endline, then it will not be possible to draw a conclusion. However, if spot-checks were complemented with self-reported behavioural measures at both time points then it may still be possible to draw some conclusions about your project.

What factors should organisations consider when deciding on data collection methods for COVID-19 response?

Should in-person data collection be considered during the COVID-19 pandemic?

How should organisations decide on appropriate and safe methods to assess hygiene behaviour outcomes?

Is it appropriate and safe to conduct structured observations of household handwashing behaviour?

Is it appropriate and safe to conduct household level spot checks of handwashing facilities?

Is it appropriate and safe to conduct structured observations and spot checks at public facilities?

What are the benefits and limitations of using self-reported handwashing outcome measures?